Comments on: Roche, the UCI and the media scrum

By: Love Yellow

Love Yellow — Sun, 04 Nov 2012 09:02:12 +0000

Thanks for this article – another sharp insight, much needed.
Understanding the depth of the drug problem is like putting together a massive jigsaw on a tea tray, indecipherable because it’s been carelessly stuffed back in the cupboard so many times with bits missing.
I found andother missing piece in Robert Millar’s critical article about the UCI, where amongst other things, he cites their setting of the 50% haematocrit rule, which I think shows what self assuming mini god’s these UCI men in suits are.

By: no_use_for_a_name

no_use_for_a_name — Sun, 04 Nov 2012 04:17:11 +0000

I think Roche is saying Pat’s not the only one that needs to go. He’s right.
Hein Verdruggen is the guy that got Pat hired. At minimum, Hein, Pat, and Alain need to go and World Cycling Productions needs to be killed.

By: no_use_for_a_name

no_use_for_a_name — Sun, 04 Nov 2012 04:17:11 +0000

He’s trying to stay employed and drop some hints.
**Everything** about the 7x win was suspicious and not a word out of Pat and Hein. To date, my crazy theory is the TdF wins were bought.

By: cycletard

cycletard — Sat, 03 Nov 2012 21:22:10 +0000

Seamus_H Yes, thank you. That fact is stated in the sixth paragraph from the end of this piece. Didn’t you read it?

By: Seamus_H

Seamus_H — Sat, 03 Nov 2012 19:37:13 +0000

McQuaid’s son is Roche’s agent.