<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"

	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Biopassport failure to flag Armstrong &#8211; advanced class</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cyclismas.com/biscuits/biopassport-failure-to-flag-armstrong-advanced-class/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cyclismas.com/biscuits/biopassport-failure-to-flag-armstrong-advanced-class/</link>
	<description>a fresh take on cycling news and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 20:10:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: no_use_for_a_name</title>
		<link>http://www.cyclismas.com/biscuits/biopassport-failure-to-flag-armstrong-advanced-class/#comment-863</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[no_use_for_a_name]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyclismas.com/?p=13430#comment-863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those interested, the APMU is described correctly by veloclinic as I understand it by reading the WADA standards.  However, the APMU is run by humans who are routing suspicious tests.   Ashenden makes it clear that athletes have been caught with &quot;too normal&quot; values like Armstrong&#039;s. 
Based on scant information provided over time, it seems Saugy&#039;s lab was providing the APMU service.    IMHO, the samples were never passed.  Someone, somewhere knew better than to pass Armstrong&#039;s probably suspicious results.  
The UCI was picking winners.  How exactly? Not sure.  The test suppression explains Sky&#039;s **extraordinary** 2012.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those interested, the APMU is described correctly by veloclinic as I understand it by reading the WADA standards.  However, the APMU is run by humans who are routing suspicious tests.   Ashenden makes it clear that athletes have been caught with &#8220;too normal&#8221; values like Armstrong&#8217;s.<br />
Based on scant information provided over time, it seems Saugy&#8217;s lab was providing the APMU service.    IMHO, the samples were never passed.  Someone, somewhere knew better than to pass Armstrong&#8217;s probably suspicious results.  <br />
The UCI was picking winners.  How exactly? Not sure.  The test suppression explains Sky&#8217;s **extraordinary** 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
